The Best Invention of the Year:2009

Posted by Bhanu Prasad

From a rocket of the future to a $10 million lightbulb, here are TIME's picks for the best new gadgets and breakthrough ideas of the year 2009

67 Worlds Most Powerful People of 2009

Posted by Bhanu Prasad

The 67 heads of state, criminals, financiers and philanthropists who really run the world. "I love power. But it is as an artist that I love it. I love it as a musician loves his violin, to draw out its sounds and chords and harmonies." --Napoleon Bonaparte

The Worlds Smallest Helicopter For Sale

Posted by Bhanu Prasad

The 60 mm rotor diameter Picoflyer is the smallest RC helicopter ever presented, it is a one-off prototype and it is not intended for sale

Space Saver Device Electronic Charger

Posted by Bhanu Prasad

six-device electronics charger is quite simply a compact multiple-adapter power station that can charge cell phones, PDAs, digital cameras, headsets, and MP3 players.

Toy Robot With Voice Recognition for Home Automation

Posted by Bhanu Prasad

Chapit is a unique toy-like robot from Fuji Housing company in Japan. The robot has voice-recognition capabilities and can understand up to 10,000 different commands

What's Inside your Coffee cup?

Posted by Bhanu Prasad

This is why the world produces more than 16 billion pounds of coffee beans per year. It's actually an alkaloid plant toxin (like nicotine and cocaine), a bug killer that stimulates us by blocking neuroreceptors for the sleep chemical adenosine. The result....

Contact lenses with built-in virtual graphics

Posted by Bhanu Prasad

We might soon get to see contact lenses with built-in virtual graphics, as researchers are working on the idea of projecting images into the eye from a contact lens.

Forbes Magazine Top 10 Most Wanted Fugitives-2010

Posted by Bhanu Prasad

The magazine, which has been releasing a list of most wanted fugitives for the past three years, pointed out that Dawood, who is believed to be hiding in Pakistan, possibly had a hand in aiding LeT execute the 2008 Mumbai attacks and also shares smuggling routes with Al-Qaeda.

Godse is often a misunderstood character. He is referred to as a Hindu fanatic. It is often hard to understand Godse because the Government of India had suppressed information about him. His court statements, letters etc. were all banned from the public until recently. Judging from his writings one thing becomes very clear – He was no fanatic. His court statements are very well read out and indicate a calm and collected mental disposition. He never even once speaks ill about Gandhi as a person, but only attacks Gandhi’s policies which caused ruin and untold misery to Hindus. Another interesting point to note is that Godse had been working with the Hindu refugees fleeing from Pakistan. He had seen the horrible atrocities committed on them. Many women had their hands cut off, nose cut off, even little girls had been raped mercilessly. Despite this Godse did not harm even single Muslim in India which he could easily have. So it would be a grave mistake to call him a Hindu fanatic.

Let us start by studying the motive behind Godse’s act. By seeing the nature of the assassination in public space and Godse’s act of turning himself over to the Police, we can see that Godse did not do this for personal reasons. He very well knew that he would be hanged and his name would be disgraced as Gandhi was considered a saint. And again Godse could have ran away and escaped punishment. But he did the reverse. He called a police officer and courted arrest. Before we proceed it would be wise to understand the backdrop of the assassination.

The central government had taken a decision — Pakistan will not be given Rs 55 crores. On January 13 Gandhi started a fast unto death that Pakistan must be given the money. On January 13, the central government changed its earlier decision and announced that Pakistan would be given the amount. On January 13, Nathuram decided to assassinate Gandhi.

Nathuram Godse was a learned man, very sharp and intelligent – editor of “Agrani” (one of the most famous newspaper of that time – with Nana Aapte). In his last editorial of “Agrani” which he changed overnight – he said “Gandhi must be stopped – at any cost” and he justified why Gandhiji’s assassination was not only inevitable but also a delayed action, sth tht shud’ve happened LONG AGO.

In Nathuram’s words - “ I don’t refute Gandhi’s theory of non-violence. He may be a saint but he is not a politician. His theory of non-violence denies self-defence and self-interest. The non-violence that defines the fight for survival as violence is a theory not of non-violence but of self-destruction.The division of the nation was an unnecessary decision. What was the percentage of the Muslim population as compared to the population of the nation? There was no need for a separate nation. Had it been a just demand, Maulana Azad would not have stayed back in India. But because Jinnah insisted and because Gandhi took his side, India was divided, in spite of opposition from the nation, the Cabinet. An individual is never greater than a nation.

In a democracy you cannot put forward your demands at knife-point. Jinnah did it and Gandhi stabbed the nation with the same knife. He dissected the land and gave a piece to Pakistan. We did picket that time but in vain. The Father of our Nation went to perform his paternal duties for Pakistan! Gandhi blackmailed the cabinet with his fast unto death. His body, his threats to die are causing the destruction — geographical as well as economical — of the nation. Today, Muslims have taken a part of the nation, tomorrow Sikhs may ask for Punjab. The religions are again dividend into castes, they will demand sub-divisions of the divisions. What remains of the concept of one nation, national integration? Why did we fight the British in unison for independence? Why not separately? Bhagat Singh did not ask only for an independent Punjab or Subhash Chandra Bose for an independent Bengal?

I am going to assassinate him in the open, before the public, because I am going to do it as my duty. If I do it surreptitiously, it becomes a crime in my own eyes. I will not try to escape, I will surrender and naturally I will be hanged. One assassination, one hanging. I don’t want two executions for one assassination and I don’t want your involvement, participation or company. (This was for Nana-Apte and Veer Savarkar as they were against ghandhi’s policies too, Godse wanted to assassinate gandhi all by himself and took promise from Nana Apte that he will continue helping Veer Savarkar in rebuilding India as a strong free nation.)

On January 30, I reached Birla Bhavan at 12 pm. Gandhi was sitting outside on a cot enjoying the sunshine. Vallabhbhai Patel’s granddaughter was sitting at his feet. I had the revolver with me. I could have assassinated him easily then, but I was convinced that his assassination was to be a punishment and a sentence against him, and I would execute him. I wanted witnesses for the execution but there were none. I did not want to escape after the execution as there was not an iota of guilt in my mind. I wanted to surrender, but surrender to whom? There was a good crowd to collect for the evening prayers. I decided on the evening of January 30 as the date for Gandhi’s execution.

Gandhi climbed the steps and came forward. He had kept his hands on the shoulders of the two girls. I wanted just three seconds more. I moved two steps forward and faced Gandhi. Now I wanted to take out the revolver and salute him for whatever sacrifice and service he had made for the nation. One of the two girls was dangerously close to Gandhi and I was afraid that she might be injured in the course of firing. As a precautionary measure I went one more step ahead, bowed before him and gently pushed the girl away from the firing line. The next moment I fired at Gandhi. Gandhi was very weak, there was a feeble sound like ‘aah’ (There are proof that Gandhi did NOT say “Hey Raam” at that time – it’s just made up stuff ) from him and he fell down.

After the firing I raised my hand holding the revolver and shouted, ‘Police, police’. For 30 seconds nobody came forward and I scanned the crowd. I saw a police officer. I signalled to him to come forward and arrest me. He came and caught my wrist, then a second man came and touched the revolver… I let it go…”

This is Nathuram Godse’s speech in court.

    Born in a devotional Brahmin family, I instinctively came to revere Hindu religion, Hindu history and Hindu culture. I had, therefore, been intensely proud of Hinduism as a whole. As I grew up I developed a tendency to free thinking unfettered by any superstitious allegiance to any isms, political or religious. That is why I worked actively for the eradication of untouchability and the caste system based on birth alone. I openly joined anti-caste movements and maintained that all Hindus were of equal status as to rights, social and religious and should be considered high or low on merit alone and not through the accident of birth in a particular caste or profession. I used publicly to take part in organized anti-caste dinners in which thousands of Hindus, Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaisyas, Chamars and Bhangis participated. We broke the caste rules and dined in the company of each other.I have read the speeches and writings of Dadabhai Nairoji, Vivekanand, Gokhale, Tilak, along with the books of ancient and modern history of India and some prominent countries like England, France, America and’ Russia. Moreover I studied the tenets of Socialism and Marxism. But above all I studied very closely whatever Veer Savarkar and Gandhiji had written and spoken, as to my mind these two ideologies have contributed more to the moulding of the thought and action of the Indian people during the last thirty years or so, than any other single factor has done.

    All this reading and thinking led me to believe it was my first duty to serve Hindudom and Hindus both as a patriot and as a world citizen. To secure the freedom and to safeguard the just interests of some thirty crores (300 million) of Hindus would automatically constitute the freedom and the well being of all India, one fifth of human race. This conviction led me naturally to devote myself to the Hindu Sanghtanist ideology and programme, which alone, I came to believe, could win and preserve the national independence of Hindustan, my Motherland, and enable her to render true service to humanity as well.

    Since the year 1920, that is, after the demise of Lokamanya Tilak, Gandhiji’s influence in the Congress first increased and then became supreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their intensity and were reinforced by the slogan of truth and non-violence, which he paraded ostentatiously before the country. No sensible or enlightened person could object to those slogans. In fact there is nothing new or original in them. They are implicit in every constitutional public movement. But it is nothing but a mere dream if you imagine that the bulk of mankind is, or can ever become, capable of scrupulous adherence to these lofty principles in its normal life from day to day. In fact, honour, duty and love of one’s own kith and kin and country might often compel us to disregard non-violence and to use force. I could never conceive that an armed resistance to an aggression is unjust. I would consider it a religious and moral duty to resist and, if possible, to overpower such an enemy by use of force. [In the Ramayana] Rama killed Ravana in a tumultuous fight and relieved Sita. [In the Mahabharata], Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness; and Arjuna had to fight and slay quite a number of his friends and relations including the revered Bhishma because the latter was on the side of the aggressor. It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama, Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed a total ignorance of the springs of human action.

    In more recent history, it was the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checked and eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India. It was absolutely essentially for Shivaji to overpower and kill an aggressive Afzal Khan, failing which he would have lost his own life. In condemning history’s towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Gobind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhiji has merely exposed his self-conceit. He was, paradoxical, as it may appear, a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name of truth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen forever for the freedom they brought to them.

    The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhi should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhi had done very well in South Africa to uphold the rights and well being of the Indian community there. But when he finally returned to India he developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be the final judge of what was right or wrong. If the country wanted his leadership, it had to accept his infallibility; if it did not, he would stand aloof from the Congress and carry on his own way. Against such an attitude there can be no halfway house. Either Congress had to surrender its will to his and had to be content with playing second fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality, metaphysics and primitive vision, or it had to carry on without him. He alone was the Judge of everyone and everything; he was the master brain guiding the civil disobedience movement; no other could know the technique of that movement. He alone knew when to begin and when to withdraw it. The movement might succeed or fail, it might bring untold disaster and political reverses but that could make no difference to the Mahatma’s infallibility. ‘A Satyagrahi can never fail’ was his formula for declaring his own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what a Satyagrahi is.

    Thus, the Mahatma became the judge and jury in his own cause. These childish insanities and obstinacies, coupled with a most severe austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character made Gandhi formidable and irresistible. Many people thought that his politics were irrational but they had either to withdraw from the Congress or place their intelligence at his feet to do with, as he liked. In a position of such absolute irresponsibility Gandhi was guilty of blunder after blunder, failure after failure, disaster after disaster.

    Gandhi’s pro-Muslim policy is blatantly in his perverse attitude on the question of the national language of India. It is quite obvious that Hindi has the most prior claim to be accepted as the premier language. In the beginning of his career in India, Gandhi gave a great impetus to Hindi but as he found that the Muslims did not like it, he became a champion of what is called Hindustani. Everybody in India knows that there is no language called Hindustani; it has no grammar; it has no vocabulary. It is a mere dialect; it is spoken, but not written. It is a bastard tongue and crossbreed between Hindi and Urdu, and not even the Mahatma’s sophistry could make it popular. But in his desire to please the Muslims he insisted that Hindustani alone should be the national language of India. His blind followers, of course, supported him and the so-called hybrid language began to be used. The charm and purity of the Hindi language was to be prostituted to please the Muslims. All his experiments were at the expense of the Hindus.

    From August 1946 onwards the private armies of the Muslim League began a massacre of the Hindus. The then Viceroy, Lord Wavell, though distressed at what was happening, would not use his powers under the Government of India Act of 1935 to prevent the rape, murder and arson. The Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to Karachi with some retaliation by the Hindus. The Interim Government formed in September was sabotaged by its Muslim League members right from its inception, but the more they became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they were a part, the greater was Gandhi’s infatuation for them. Lord Wavell had to resign as he could not bring about a settlement and he was succeeded by Lord Mountbatten. King Log was followed by King Stork.

    The Congress, which had boasted of its nationalism and socialism, secretly accepted Pakistan literally at the point of the bayonet and abjectly surrendered to Jinnah. India was vivisected and one-third of the Indian territory became foreign land to us from August 15, 1947. Lord Mountbatten came to be described in Congress circles as the greatest Viceroy and Governor-General this country ever had. The official date for handing over power was fixed for June 30, 1948, but Mountbatten with his ruthless surgery gave us a gift of vivisected India ten months in advance. This is what Gandhi had achieved after thirty years of undisputed dictatorship and this is what Congress party calls ‘freedom’ and ‘peaceful transfer of power’. The Hindu-Muslim unity bubble was finally burst and a theocratic state was established with the consent of Nehru and his crowd and they have called ‘freedom won by them with sacrifice’ – whose sacrifice? When top leaders of Congress, with the consent of Gandhi, divided and tore the country – which we consider a deity of worship – my mind was filled with direful anger.

    One of the conditions imposed by Gandhi for his breaking of the fast unto death related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by the Hindu refugees. But when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much as utter a single word to protest and censure the Pakistan Government or the Muslims concerned. Gandhi was shrewd enough to know that while undertaking a fast unto death, had he imposed for its break some condition on the Muslims in Pakistan, there would have been found hardly any Muslims who could have shown some grief if the fast had ended in his death. It was for this reason that he purposely avoided imposing any condition on the Muslims. He was fully aware of from the experience that Jinnah was not at all perturbed or influenced by his fast and the Muslim League hardly attached any value to the inner voice of Gandhi.

    Gandhi is being referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so, he had failed his paternal duty inasmuch as he has acted very treacherously to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it. I stoutly maintain that Gandhi has failed in his duty. He has proved to be the Father of Pakistan. His inner-voice, his spiritual power and his doctrine of non-violence of which so much is made of, all crumbled before Jinnah’s iron will and proved to be powerless.

    Briefly speaking, I thought to myself and foresaw I shall be totally ruined, and the only thing I could expect from the people would be nothing but hatred and that I shall have lost all my honour, even more valuable than my life, if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the same time I felt that the Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would surely be proved practical, able to retaliate, and would be powerful with armed forces. No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation would be saved from the inroads of Pakistan. People may even call me and dub me as devoid of any sense or foolish, but the nation would be free to follow the course founded on the reason which I consider to be necessary for sound nation-building. After having fully considered the question, I took the final decision in the matter, but I did not speak about it to anyone whatsoever. I took courage in both my hands and I did fire the shots at Gandhiji on 30th January 1948, on the prayer-grounds of Birla House.

    I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action had brought rack and ruin and destruction to millions of Hindus. There was no legal machinery by which such an offender could be brought to book and for this reason I fired those fatal shots.

    I bear no ill will towards anyone individually but I do say that I had no respect for the present government owing to their policy, which was unfairly favourable towards the Muslims. But at the same time I could clearly see that the policy was entirely due to the presence of Gandhi. I have to say with great regret that Prime Minister Nehru quite forgets that his preachings and deeds are at times at variances with each other when he talks about India as a secular state in season and out of season, because it is significant to note that Nehru has played a leading role in the establishment of the theocratic state of Pakistan, and his job was made easier by Gandhi’s persistent policy of appeasement towards the Muslims.

    I now stand before the court to accept the full share of my responsibility for what I have done and the judge would, of course, pass against me such orders of sentence as may be considered proper. But I would like to add that I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me, nor do I wish that anyone else should beg for mercy on my behalf. My confidence about the moral side of my action has not been shaken even by the criticism levelled against it on all sides. I have no doubt that honest writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof some day in future.


38 Response to "Why NATHURAM GODSE Killed Gandhi..."

  1. KPN Said,

    There is a Phrase in Malayalam that
    "Ammaye thalliyalum Randundu Paksham"
    Means that 'The person who beats his mother also will say some reason for that'....
    The common people in India will see this post like that....

    If i am disagree with your article, can I kill you?


  2. Sujal Phadke Said,

    This comment has been removed by the author.


  3. nn Said,

    I always knew that Nathuram was right... Silly people and silly givernment....


  4. manu Said,

    how can u people blindly believe that only gandhi is only
    do you think that non violence is correct in every place
    for example the teacher slaping you hardly without any reason ,can u show your another side with laughing
    that was the position of the people at that time
    is bhagat singh,chandresekhar azad,allui siarama raju etc.. are idiots
    just think naturally that how many people died because of gandhi
    i am not telling u people that gandhi was wrong in all aspects but he was not correct in all aspects
    something was hidden in the history if u know please scrap me.
    if u understand this then i am ur friend manojkumar


  5. my limits Said,

    nothing wrong with the comments above and upcoming comments below.. it all states their view as an indian.. but not as a tamilian.... i stand on godse views.. but today as gandi successed everybody is doing his job as his same thinkin rite from politicians to igs to commmon man


  6. karthick Said,

    If Gandhiji is not in the part of freedom fighting .we got independence earlier by using violence as did by nethaji and many more


  7. Jayesh Said,

    ! Jai Akhand Hindu Rastra !
    First of All Nathuram was a Freedom Fighter as of all other. He was in Hyderabad Freedom Movement. So Please Dont misunderstand him.
    After Separation Of India, Pakistan demanded 55 crore. Because the partition of India was on total wealth of India. That time India's wealth was 220 crore. so they demanded 1/4 of 220 crore.
    But India had 110 crore loan which was taken by congress govt in time of world war II. So Vallabh Bhai Patel asked Pakistan to Share loan also. But pakistan refused that, and due to this reason Congress also refused to 55 crore to give them. And The So called Mahatma started fast. And This is the biggest reason of "Why Nathuram Godse Killed Gandhi?"
    Let I tell you 'Why Nathuram Killed Gandhi On 30th Jan.?"
    After 15 august 1947, Every Maharaja, Nawab should merge his state in India. But Hyderabad Nizam was refusing to merge his "Sansthan" In India. On this issue Nizam's P.A. met gandhi on 3rd week of Jan. and arranged meeting of nizam and gandhi on 3rd Feb.
    As per gandhi's policies towards muslims, Nathuram had fear that if gandhi accept nizam's Private state. And He knew gandhi will accept nizam's all things, because he was muslim. and that will be harmful to democracy and also Hindu.
    And Nathuram Decided to kill Gandhi on 30th Jan, 1948.

    "जे जे उत्तम उदात्त उन्नत, ते आम्ही स्मरणारच, देशासाठी जन्मणार आणि देशासाठी मरणारंच, महानतेला त्रिवार प्रणाम, पण..... काळाची 'गरज' सरत नाही ! मी नथुराम गोडसे बोलतोय... पण कोणी सुद्धा ऐकत नाही !"


  8. rakesh Said,

    i hate gandhi... he is the only culprit, to be india like this now... with his policies... karthick and jayesh i will agree with you 100%


  9. If it was possible... I'd bring Gandhi back to life several times and shoot him to death over and over again. Violence is not the way, but self defense and self protection must come to the fore also. Plus a saint only cares about how many worshipers he can have and how many he can lead onto the so called "path of light". A strategist knows what is needed at a time like this... as if over 200 years of slavery was not enough, that we have saints coming up to teach us to still be enslaved forever. Not done.


  10. ktk Said,

    the injury caused by nathoram godse is big to all indians.Gandhiji is the father of our nation.MIND IT!!!!!!Early or late he is the one who lead India to freedom.


  11. Simmi! Said,

    i do agree with jayesh! ...! He was juz a black spot on India! Silk production in India ... was wrong ... for making silk cocoons are killed.... dis is also a non violence .. thn why gandhi dint object for this case...! he studied from london .. south africa .. and many more foreign places.. why he asked indians to study from india ... not from forgein ,, wHY ?? why cant every citizen have higher studies ?? ... he had a gr8 wife ..... !!! whn his wife was pregnant .. he kicked his wife out of his home ... !! and his wife just use to cry n nthing else! .... if he had such a wife thn why he use to have girls .. in his shoulder?? .... why only girls for his protection ... why not boys? he did many more crap things !! As a person i truly disrespect him ..! and i dont consider him FATHER OF Nation ... n i respect whole heartedly n thank nathuram for his act of killing gandhi!


  12. I always knew that Nathuram was right... Silly people and silly givernment....


  13. nitish Said,

    Dear ppl who has written here about mahatma gandhi plz take consideration that if you want to buy something in india you give a currency note
    from urself wich has a pic of the great gandhi....
    Not yor beloved godse...


  14. oenjzumbl Said,

    I don't know how much I HATE the NAME
    GANDHI I wish to God that please Free our nation from the false and illicit charm of These bantered Gandhis.THEY had spoiled it


  15. AMIT SAHOO Said,

    Amit Sahoo said.
    We all have right of expression and speech in this free country, thanks to all freedom fighters. Thanks to these great people that today we can abuse them for what they did. May be right or wrong but they led a very difficult life, sacrificed their families and all worldly pleasure. Today we, are abusing them, who only live for ourself, my family, my job, my kid, my kids future. So we donot have any moral right for abusing them. I do not want to compare diff policies of diff freedom fighters since it will only criticise policy of the other. But we should not forget that all the policies were for the common goal. Regarding Gandhiji, even he was a human and possibly he also had the same weaknesses as one of us. But the people of India made him Mahatma and there must be a good reason for that.


  16. VIPIN SHARMA Said,

    Jayesh, I really appreciate your comments, I really want this should be made clear to all Indians, that Gandhi was never a hero of India, he did good jobs in foreign, but still it was not for India, he was in politics, and he was a 100% politician, he was always an CONGRESSIAN, and congress have been playing with India since that time.... CONGRESS should be thrown away from India, I dont know when would every people in India will know the correct truth about such people...


  17. The particular book was banned on 1995 or 1997 ,i mnt remembering the exact book name..but i have read it & it was too gud stuff inside.i.e. i just cant close it till i touched the finishing line..just read it in one shot..In ...that, there were around 110 points ,which Nathuram Godse put up in front of the judge during his trial @ the court & i m sure whoms ever has read that book fortunately ..cannt deny anyone of them..Hope i could get one chance to read it again..


  18. krishna Said,

    Very well said!!!Then and now Hindus are being exploited..even now thw nation needs income from temples to do nation building but how many christian churches or muslim mosques contribute to it???In Kerala majority of Government's expenditure is met by the income from Devasom board....but still Hindus are disrespected...I dont say they are perfect but...they shouldn't be exploited...Dont create any more NATHURAM GODSE!!!


  19. Rahul Said,

    Gandhi is not right in all aspects some time non violence is needed as Lord krishna did the same for Dharma, Today our govt. not respect the other freedom fighters only due to the Great mahtma Ghandi in-spite of the contribution of Bhagat subhash Bose and many more was more than The Gandhji. I also respect the Mahtma but He was not the right man for National Father


  20. yoga Said,

    I do have a same mindset of Nathuram Godse.

    Only merit should be appriciated and not the religion.




  21. tanay Said,

    definitely there is picture of gandhi j on each and every note but it not because of gandhi greatness its because of congress greatness towards gandhi.


  22. AKSHAY Said,

    if a person how do partion of the country on the path of non-voilence,then how will he become mahatma.......In baba shaheb ambedkar’s own words “Gandhi Age is the Dark Age of India”. BABA SAHEB has also said in interview to BBC that “A PERSON WHO CHEATS AND KEEP OTHER PEOPLE IN DARK TO THAT PERSON IF YOU SAY A MAHATMA THEN GANDHI IS A MAHATMA.”


  23. shashi Said,

    Jyothi prakash,
    An argument is going on between me and one of my friend regarding Ghodse,just now saw ur comments and u have mentioned a book where he has listed 110 points infront of judge,to justify his killing of gandhi is it possible to list out some or give any reference if have any extra info please mail it to my email ID


  24. Niraj Kumar Said,

    with great respect I am saying that Gandhi ji was a great person with great quality.

    but still the decision n request he had putted across teh team was pathetic when you are giving land giving money giving every thing to Muslims then why you had not requested to shift all the muslims from India to go there why half here half there now rest of these guys are only creating ruckus/all the nonsense in india & one fine day will come they will defiantly will raise a voice again to make another partition in india. another bad day for india again...


  25. Overly biased article, too pro-assassination.


  26. I always knew that Nathuram was right 100 persent right


  27. appu Said,

    yes i do agree wth the comment of jayesh but we cant speak thease words infront of anybody because indians are very kind hearted and they are really wth a great respect towards gandhiji because as as gandhiji having more publicity we are studying abt him in books,cinemas everywhere as a hero and godse as a villan but whn we will say now godse as a hero nobody will accept it and they will think we as against to india i thnk this great story will come into the public very soon and everybody will realise i will definetly belive that godse as a real hero and i really salute him as a indian to a indian freedom fighter whole heartedly


  28. Goyal Akash Said,

    Hi friends, do you known that Nathuram godse didn't killed the Gandhi? different people have different opinion. so i think that Nehru killed Gandhi, because only was nehru who had been taken benefits of nehru death, do you known that gandhi was declared Sardar Patel as The Prime Minister Of India on stage, and only nehru was afraid that if gandhi has announced Patel as PM of India then he will not PM of India, that's the more powerful reason of gandhi murder, second godse was longest compare gandhi if he had shoot gandhi then bullet out from gandhi height, third nehru didn't want to postmortem of gandhi, because he was afraid that if truth will came out of gandhi death, people will not accept him as PM of India,
    so my dear friends many powerful and believable facts are hidden in our past, so please don't called nathu ram godse is not real Indian, in true words he was only one person of freedom Hindustan who was real Indian. so please give the respect his family and him and please called him with respected words because he deserved your love and respect, you people do you known that some powerful facts of gandhi and his some words about Hindu & Muscleman & English government if no then you should give some time and read below notes:-
    1. No matter what exactly the truth is, the biggest truth of all is that if you go to any corner of earth and ask any stranger to name two Indians he has heard of in his lifetime; the answer in all likelihood will be (1) Gautam Buddha and (2) Mahatma Gandhi.
    2. 5 world leaders who got Noble Peace prize viz. Martin Luther King Jr. (USA), Dalai Lama (Tibet), Aung San Suu Kyi (Myanmar), Nelson Mandela (S. Africa) and Adolfo Perez Esquivel (Argentina)but Gandhi not. Why?
    3. Sahid Bhagat Sing first arrest hue the sirf Against British leaflet batney kelea. Shahid Khudiram Bose ko 16 years old mey hi Fasi dey diya gaya. Netaji subhas bose ko gum karwa diya gaya taki desh ki bagdor apne hath me ley sakey congress. Leken so calling Gandhi ko kuch bhi nehi kiya gaya. Is admi ney 30 core Hindustani ko sirf 10 lakh British ke same Hizra banake rakh diya. Taki British humey loot tey rahey. Or janey ki baad desh unko dey kar jaye. Agar MG ne ek bar bhi kaha ke british ko maro, to uske dusre din India independent ho jata.
    4.Hindu girls raped by Muslaman,then gandhi said that why are you crying they didn't take anything from you because they had given something to you. these words was you Bapu Gandhi.
    5. he avoid the rule of kashmir because there was a hindu king and he support hyderabad ruler because he was muslaman.
    6. he supported masjed and avoided temples in india,


  29. i hate gandhi.. he is the only culprit, to be
    india like this now... with his policies...

    In one para I lyk one sentence i.e. Gandhiji was not father of nation he was father of pakistan.


  30. vinay joshi Said,

    Gandhi was never a hero of India, he did good jobs in foreign, but still it was not for India, he was in politics, and he was a 100% politician, he was always an CONGRESSIAN, many of indian died because of his wrong decisions. Some people just filled air and made gandhi bigger all for thier profit..


  31. i do agree with dear friends many powerful and believable facts are hidden in our past, so please don't called nathu ram godse is not real Indian, in true words he was only one person of freedom Hindustan who was real Indian


  32. Mr Nathuram done his best job but if He killed to Nehru that will be good for Nation, because he was also culprit for divide the India & also responsible for hide the document of Subhas Chandra Bose's real death reson.


  33. Smith Said,

    I was always against of Gandhi except his non violence strategy. I had always a soft corner for Nathu Ji as he did the right as a true patriot, but a bit late. He did it right otherwise what else Gandhi would have done to India.........Thanks and I salute To "The NathuRam Godse".


  34. saksham jain Said,

    shame on india there is a national holiday on gandhi birthday not on bhagat singh's .every child knw the DOB of gandhi why not bhagat singh .


  35. freekykid Said,

    A self centered politician goes about doing what he believes is the infallible truth. He foolishly believes that with non violence he is super powerful. Nathuram godse believed otherwise and showed us that Gandhi was just that a self centered and egoistic politician of that day; who had to be stopped before he destroyed a newly born republic.


  36. Tony Said,

    You allguys are fu@@ing bastards what u have done for your country so far except for yourself.ucant even bare one stick of Punjab police now imagine how much those freedom fighters like gandhiji or anyone else suffered if no one fight that time we still be salves because Britishers were very much happy to keep India,remember freedom fighters kicked Britishers out not that they leave bythemself.nd godse don't know bout him which hell he would be burning even u kill some animal or anyone u get paap not to mention Gandhi so think before u say.


  37. Niraj Kumar Said,

    dear Mr. tony,
    Here no one have asked to tell you about yourself as you mentioned F@@ing bas...d., if you are interested go back & read the history properly & do compare with current situation of india.

    n FYKInfo we do respect the freedom fighters as they are the one who have did so much for us so that we can still be proudly say they were the best.


  38. Just to get rid of a old man, Godse Sacrificed his Life... Salute to Godse...